Governance |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Constitution | Officers & Council | Annual Council Meeting Minutes | Committees | Lobbyist | Duties Annual Council Meeting Minutes
2004 Systematic Biology Annual Council Meeting: 26 June 2004, Fort Collins, Colorado
Attending: David Cannatella (President); Mike Sanderson (Past-President); Pam Soltis (President-Elect); Keith Crandall (Executive Vice President); Kevin Johnson (Program Director); Scott Edwards (Awards Chair); Chris Simon (Editor); Roderic Page (Editor Elect); Debbie Ciszek (Managing Editor), Richard O'Grady (Treasurer); Joel Cracraft (Trustee), and Councilors Paul Lewis, , Priscilla Tucker, Kelly Zamudio, Anne Yoder, Francois Lutzoni, Bruce Baldwin, Shannon Hackett, John Wiens, David Hibbett, David Penny, Elizabeth Jockusch
Not Attending: Brad Shaffer (Councilor), Terry Yates (Trustee)
Robert Harington & Liz Furgeson Blackwell Publishers: Contract expires 2007 or 2008 with Taylor & Francis. RH & LF present options with Blackwell Publishers. Blackwell has 70% Society owned journals. They specialize in such. Most prices are lower due to societies determining pricing. 98% return rate with society publishing. Blackwell works together as a partner in journal publishing. Interested in working as a global team both Blackwell and societies. Blackwell particularly wants to focus on evolutionary biology and has four (Molecular Ecology, Cladistics, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, Evolution and Development) of the top ten journals. They are very interested in Systematic Biology. They are making ecology and conservation biology a focus of media campaigns. Cannatella Simon, and Ciszek had a pre-meeting with RH and LF, discussed open access, electronic options, society benefits even in the era of print journals demise. David Penny asks about open access. RH responds this is mainly in fields with large resources. The current paradigm is expensive for individual authors (on the order of $1500 per paper). Richard O'Grady asks about online access to journals, which has been problematic with T&F due to technical difficulties of subcontractors. RH responds that members of society should get online access automatically. Membership doesn't need to support the entire journal. LF says they have set up journals through society sites instead of being required to go through Blackwell's site. Rod Page asks about supplementary material with systematic research (data sets, etc.) and the ability to house these on a website. LF suggests Blackwell is looking at such options and developing solutions currently. One option is a satellite website with direct link to supplemental material.
James Rodman, NSF Has been asked by the board to update the council on systematics at NSF and specifically on how NSF handles phylogeography proposals. JR reminds us that for the last year there have been three rotators for four slots – NSF needs rotators to serve the community at NSF! JR charges council to think of creative ways to encourage members to find ways to get more members to NSF. We are missing one voice in the halls of NSF. If you're interested, contact program officers or division directors at NSF. Presents handouts for consideration to publish with council minutes (not published here but available at www.nsf.gov). Many activities at NSF bearing on systematic biology; Fiber, Microbial Observatories, Plant Genome Research, Tree of Life, Planetary Biodiversity and Inventory – no new money at the moment, REVSYS, DDIG. Phylogeography is handled by Population Biology, which now has two panels with one focusing on ecological studies and the other focusing more on core population biology including phylogeography; phylogeography proposals involving multiple species are jointly reviewed by Systematic Biology panel. See updated NSF website for explicit description on new population biology clusters. JR discusses Linne as a "big bucks" potential to put funds into museums and taxonomy. Not a good time to ask for new dollars. Budgets are tight and NEON is getting up and running. The Evolutionary Synthesis Center is also getting off the ground in the fall. Therefore, it is a difficult time to ask for more money. But JR proposes minimally to pay attention to the research collections program at NSF. It has had the same budget for five years and needs the community support to help increase its budget. With the new cluster, PIs should contact program officers to help in assignment of grant proposals. Joel Cracraft suggests that Linne should be pursued as it is still 4-5 years out. If we do not push it, it won't happen. Ecological community and biodiversity managers will benefit greatly through this initiative.
Approval of Minutes: unanimous
Report on the Coordinating Council Meeting: Pam Soltis reports on joint meeting. Presentation from Mark Courtney at NSF covered much of what Jim Rodman covered with the addition of a discussion of the OPUS (Opportunities for producing understanding through synthesis) potential program discussion at NSF. Tim Beardsly (editor of BioScience) discussed opportunities for evolutionary biology presentations in this journal. They are trying to broaden their image. Current meeting was discussed. Mike Antolin reported 1300 participants, 750 talks, 4000 authors. MA suggested that the societies should contribute to the development of a joint software to use for future meetings so the tool does not need to be reinvented each year. Recommendation that next year's meeting develops software with longer-term idea in mind. The recommendation is for $5000 per society to contribute to this focus. Alaska meeting hosts are willing to develop such software. Secondly, need to designate a person or committee to interact with local organizing committee to develop program. Three options; 1) local committee, 2) society program officer or secretaries to develop, 3) some joint committee including local organizers and society designees. Upcoming meetings; 2005 Fairbanks Alaska 10-14 June (make travel plans early, website is up and running), 2006 Stony Brook 23-27 June, 2007 Auckland New Zealand, with proposals for 2008 Minnesota and 2009 Indiana University. Next year SSB is responsible for running this joint meeting.
Symposia proposals: Kevin Johnson presents proposals for symposia for next year's meeting. Megan Porter "The Subterranean Realm: Model Systems in Evolutionary Biology", David Baum "The Missing Piece of the Evolution-Education Puzzle: Teaching phylogenetics at introductory undergraduate and precollege levels", Sydney Cameron "Mimicry as a source of diversity: Paradox revisited", Chris Simon "Phylogeography: the interface between population biology and systematics", and Andrew Shedlock "Genome Analysis and Molecular Systematics of Retroelements". Council ranks proposals to eliminate a few from discussion. Baum proposal ranks highest with Shedlock and Simon proposals for discussion. Shedlock and Baum proposals are accepted for next year. We need a new program chair as Kevin Johnson's term is expiring.
Election Results: Keith Crandall presented election results; Scott Edwards President Elect with the following new councilors (Jeffrey Boore, Sydney Cameron, Louise Lewis, Maureen O'Leary, and Scott Steppan).
Award Results: Scott Edwards $12,000 budget for Graduate Student Awards. SE recommends an increase in budget for the awards. The SSB Graduate Student Awards were judged by Greg Spicer (San Francisco Sate University), Susana Magallon (UNAM Mexico), and Scott Edwards (Harvard). Of 40 applicants, seven 2004 SSB Graduate Student Research Awards were made to the following individuals; Rachelle Adams (UT Austin), Ashley Egan (Brigham Young University), Micah Dunthorn (University of Massachusetts), Rachel Novick (Yale University), Elin Claridge (UC Berkeley), Jill Holliday (Florida State University), and Santiago Ramirez (Harvard University). Ernst Mayr Award competitors presented in extended symposium. There were 18 abstract submissions with 15 invited to compete with Lena Hileman (Yale), David Pollock (LSU), George Weiblen (University of Minnesota), and Scott Edwards (Harvard) as judges. Scott Edwards reports the winner of the 2004 Ernst Mayr Award was Christopher Witt from Louisiana State University with a talk titled "A re-examination of the phylogenetic evidence for molecular punctuated equilibria" authored by himself and Robb T. Brumfield. Keith Crandall reports on Mini-Peet awards and Travel Awards. Of a total of 26 applicants, four Mini-PEET Awards were made to the following individuals; Michael Medrano (University of New Mexico), Tiago Quental (Harvard University), Mike Dickison (Duke University), and Trevor Hodkinson (University of Dublin). Of 24 total applicants for the Travel Awards, five awards were made to the following individuals; Ruxandra Bucur (Romania), Héctor Romero (Uruguay), Amadou Sall (Senegal), Damodara Rao (India), Claudia Silva (Mexico). The total budget for the Mini-PEET Awards was $15,000 with $14,600 allocated. The total budget for the Travel Awards started at $12,000 but was increased by consent of the Executive Council to $15,000, of which the entire amount was allocated. Scott Edwards presents concern about travel money to student award winners – future travel support should not be extended as it is impossible to budget in advance. Crandall presents Vicki Funk's concerns about funding international folks. This includes the ability to deduct an annual membership fee from the award amount, a statement about US IRS regulations to be included in the award announcement, and the proposal of a "key" for each award winner detailing all the necessary paperwork for payment. Congratulations to all the SSB award winners on their well-deserved recognition!
Financial Report: Richard O'Grady presents updated figures for 2003-2004. Travel Award distributions not yet included.
SSB Finances for 2003, as of December
2003 Income:
Editorial Office (T&F) $25,000 Royalties & Memberships $45,931 2002 Annual Meeting $6,506 Misc. $3,892 (JSTOR, CCC, etc.)
TOTAL INCOME: $81,329
2003 Expenses:
Editorial Office $44,664 Officers Travel $2,000 Symposia $8,000 Awards $12,119 Mini-PEETs $16,920 AIBS Public Policy Office services on behalf of SSB $3,000 Misc. $1,500 (AIBS dues, NSCA dues, etc.)
TOTAL EXPENSES: $88,203
SURPLUS/DEFICIT: ($6,874)
CHECKING BANK ACCOUNT BALANCE: $129,969.78
SSB Finances for 2004, as of June
2004 Income:
Editorial Office (T&F) $26,250 Royalties & Memberships $43,004 2003 Annual Meeting $10,633 Misc. $3,839 (JSTOR, CCC, etc.)
TOTAL INCOME: $83,726
2004 Expenses:
Editorial Office $26,800 (committed/disbursed so far) Officers Travel $2,000 (projected, based upon prior years) Symposia $8,000 (budgeted based upon prior years) Awards $13,698 Mini-PEETs $14,600 Travel Awards $15,000 Accounting & Tax services $3,000 Website $5,000 (projected based upon agreement with Ruedi) AIBS Public Policy Office services on behalf of SSB $3,000 Misc. $1,000 (AIBS dues, NSCA dues, etc.)
TOTAL EXPENSES: $92,098
SURPLUS/DEFICIT: ($8,372)
CHECKING BANK ACCOUNT BALANCE: $143,243
Trustee's Report: Joel Cracraft reports that 2003 was a good year for SSB. The large cash amount is an aberration from the consolidation of multiple accounts. Most of that cash is now invested. Cracraft presented the need another trustee (the board of trustees typically has three members). Council votes unanimously to appointment of Vicki Funk as a third member of the Board of Trustees.
Trustee's Report
The past year was finally a good one for the market. The Nasdaq ended the year up 50.01%, Standard and Poor's 500 closed up 26.38% and the DOW gained 25.32% for the year. The SSB reserve fund faired extremely well, experiencing a gain of 34.32% ($131,063) over the value on 31 December, 2002. The Trustees are also happy to report that all but two of the society's accounts which were distributed over 7 accounts in 6 states have been consolidated into one in Albuquerque and the remaining two will be moved soon. The high percentage of the fund in cash and year's end reflects the fact that to consolidate our accounts some had to be liquidated which we did near the end of the year. All but 10% of our cash reserves were reinvested in mutual funds after the 1st of the year so the current distribution is approximately 90% equities and 10% cash. The Trustees have chosen to maintain a balanced portfolio primarily of mutual funds instead of individual stocks. Although some consider this a conservative approach, we feel this offers the potential for the greatest amount of growth with the least amount of risk. The status of our investments and the distribution of funds as of 31 December, 2003 is provided below.
*Includes a single donation of $30,000 which we invested per the donors request in the American Balanced A Fund. On 31 December, 2003 that fund had a value of $ 31,609.
Editor Report: Chris Simon presents Editor's Report. Presents proposal to increase institutional subscription rate to cover the costs of additional pages. Scott Edwards recommends shortening papers coming out in SB. David Penny suggests page charges after 10 pages to encourage shorter pages (and increase revenue). Shannon Hackett suggests that with a goal for an increasing society membership, submissions will continue to increase. Thus the limit of pages will continue to be problematic. Simon moves to raise our institutional subscription rate by $9 in addition to the Taylor and Francis annual increase proposed as %7.2. This will allow for 32 additional pages per issue per year to be published and thereby reduce time to publication. Motion passes unanimously. Still some free subscriptions available for international researchers. Best student paper awards presented. Melissa James from Taylor and Francis offers book coupons for runner up for the best student paper awards. David Cannatella thanks CS for her efforts as Editor.
Editor Report
Impact Factor Statistics: Impact factor statistics were released in June of 2004 for 2003. Systematic Biology's impact factor has risen from 7.112 to 7.740. The top journals in the newly created category "Evolutionary Biology" are: TREE, Systematic Biology, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, and Molecular Biology and Evolution, in that order. Because TREE is a review journal, we are once again the most highly ranked primary research journal in Evolutionary Biology. Note that the impact factor scores are comparable across categories. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Country of residence, corresponding author |
2001
|
2002
|
2003
|
2004 (1Jan-20Jun) |
|
USA |
45 (38%) |
77 (55%) |
79 (49%) |
26 (33%) |
|
Canada |
8 |
14 |
7 |
6 |
|
Puerto Rico |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Mexico |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Columbia |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Brazil |
4 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
|
Uruguay |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Argentina |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
|
UK |
15 |
10 |
17 |
9 |
|
Ireland |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Norway |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Sweden |
3 |
6 |
7 |
4 |
|
Finland |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Denmark |
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
|
France |
4 |
6 |
8 |
4 |
|
Spain |
0 |
2 |
5 |
2 |
|
Portugal |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Belgium |
1 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
|
The Netherlands |
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
|
Germany |
6 |
1 |
6 |
6 |
|
Austria |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
Switzerland |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
|
Italy |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Greece |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
South Africa |
2 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
|
Israel |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Pakistan |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
India |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
PR China |
0 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
|
Japan |
4 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Thailand |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Australia |
8 |
2 |
7 |
3 |
|
New Zealand |
5 |
4 |
4 |
1 |
|
Fiji |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
Manuscript processing time summary statistics: Length of time to return first reviews and length of time to publication. Ms' are included only if they underwent full review and reviews were returned to the authors before 20Jun04. For some papers submitted in 2003, future publication dates were estimated. Symposia papers are not included because only part of the processing is done by the SB editorial staff.
|
|
Time to return of |
Time from submission |
||||
|
|
first reviews (weeks) |
to publication (months) |
||||
|
Year Submitted |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
Mean |
16.6 |
16.3 |
16.8 |
13.4 |
12 |
12 |
|
Variance |
69 |
55 |
46 |
38 |
18.5 |
17.6 |
|
Standard Deviation |
8.3 |
7.4 |
6.8 |
6.2 |
4.3 |
4.2 |
* "current" is as of 20Jun04
Current status* of ms' submitted in |
|
|
|
2001 |
|
|
|
Number of manuscripts submitted |
119 |
|
|
mean # weeks in review (stand. dev.) |
15 (9) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number currently in review |
0 |
0% |
|
Number returned w/o review |
14 |
12% |
|
Number rejected |
44 |
37% |
|
Number not publishable in present form |
1 |
0.8% |
|
Number not revised |
2 |
1.7% |
|
Number withdrawn |
1 |
0.8% |
|
Number accepted, not yet published |
2 |
1.7% |
|
Number published |
55 |
46% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total rejected |
62 |
52% |
|
Total accepted |
57 |
48% |
|
|
|
|
|
Number Point of View submissions |
30 |
25% |
|
Number regular paper submissions |
89 |
75% |
|
Number POVs accepted, acceptance rate |
16 |
53% |
|
Number regular papers accepted, ac. rate |
41 |
46% |
Current status* of ms' submitted in |
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
Number of manuscripts submitted |
139 |
|
|
mean # weeks in review (stand. dev.) |
13 (9) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number currently in review |
0 |
0% |
|
Number returned w/o review |
17 |
12% |
|
Number rejected |
35 |
25% |
|
Number not publishable in present form |
2 |
1.4% |
|
Number not revised |
2 |
1.4% |
|
Number accepted, not yet published |
1 |
0.7% |
|
Number published or sent to press |
82 |
59% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total rejected |
56 |
40% |
|
Total accepted |
83 |
60% |
|
|
|
|
|
Number Point of View submissions |
37 |
27% |
|
Number regular paper submissions |
102 |
73% |
|
Number POVs accepted, acceptance rate |
15 |
40.5% |
|
Number regular papers accepted, ac. rate |
68 |
67% |
Current status* of ms' submitted |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
Number of manuscripts submitted |
160 |
|
|
mean # weeks in review (stand. dev.) |
14 (7.5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number currently in review |
0 |
0% |
|
Number returned w/o review |
24 |
15% |
|
Number rejected |
48 |
30% |
|
Number not publishable in present form |
9 |
6% |
|
Number not revised |
1 |
1% |
|
Number accepted, not yet published |
22 |
14% |
|
Number published or sent to press |
56 |
34% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total rejected |
82 |
51% |
|
Total accepted |
78 |
49% |
|
|
|
|
|
Number Point of View submissions |
43 |
27% |
|
Number regular papers |
117 |
73% |
|
Number POVs accepted, acceptance rate |
21 |
49% |
|
Number regular papers accepted, ac. rate |
57 |
49% |
Editor-Elect Report: Rod Page presents Editor-Elect report. Electronic set up of journal by October.
Of Chris Simons' panel of Associate Editors, Keith Crandall, Cliff Cunningham, Nick Goldman, Junhyong Kim, Pete Lockhart, Bruce Rannala, Mike Sanderson, Ted Schultz, Jack Sites, Jeff Thorne, and Ziheng Yang all chose to step down at the end of 2003. Those of the "old guard" remaining are: Allen J. Baker, Thomas Buckley, Tim Collins, Dan Faith, Karl Kjer, Peter Linder, François Lutzoni, Gavin Naylor, Pam Soltis, Mike Steel, and, Jack Sullivan.
I have recruited the following new AEs: Frank Anderson, Olaf Bininda-Emonds, Ron DeBry, Marshal Hedin, Michael Lee, Paul Lewis, Norm MacLeod, Todd Oakley, Adrian Paterson, Kathleen Pryer, and Vincent Savolainen.
Debbie Ciszek remains as managing editor, and has been very efficient in keeping me drowned in manuscripts. I tend to work from home in the evenings some nights, which minimises the effects of the time difference between Glasgow and Colorado.
Early in the year the DOIs for recent issues of Systematic Biology online do not work (the system that resolves a DOI into a URL for the article did not recognise the DOI). This was apparently due to a problem with Metapress, the company that T&F use to provide online content. This has now been fixed.
The journal is moving to ScholarOne's Manuscript Central web-based manuscript submission system. A 32 page "Configuration Requirements Document" has been drafted by T&F, and was the subject of a conference call involving myself, Debbie Ciszek, and Vincent Lizzi (T&F) on June 23rd. It will probably take a couple more of these before the document is finished and a test system is ready to go.
Looming on the horizon is the issue of "Open Access". In other words, should Systematic Biology move to provide completely free access to the journal? For Scientific Societies the issues are complex. In May I had an informal chat with Catriona MacCallum (Editor of PloS), who is keen to promote Open Access as a model for Societies. She is, however, aware that the matter is not a simple one. The Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI) site includes this statement:
"Society publishers-by clarifying the benefits of membership-should be able to provide Open Access to the journal's content without losing members. Stated differently, if a journal subscription provides the only incentive to society membership, then its relationship to authors and readers does not transcend the publishing function and the society may need to carefully reconsider its function and the value it delivers to its members. "
International submissions: In the year 2004, so far, 67% of submissions came from outside the US, from 20 different countries. Once again, this is evidence that Systematic Biology is a very international journal. In 2003, 51% of submissions were from outside the US; in 2002, 45% of submissions were from outside the US and in 2001, 62% of submissions were from outside the US.
|
Country of residence, corresponding author |
2004
|
|
USA |
26 (33%) |
|
Canada |
6 |
|
Puerto Rico |
|
|
Mexico |
1 |
|
Columbia |
|
|
Brazil |
|
|
Uruguay |
1 |
|
Argentina |
1 |
|
UK |
9 |
|
Ireland |
|
|
Norway |
|
|
Sweden |
4 |
|
Finland |
|
|
Denmark |
1 |
|
France |
4 |
|
Spain |
2 |
|
Portugal |
|
|
Belgium |
4 |
|
The Netherlands |
1 |
|
Germany |
6 |
|
Austria |
|
|
Switzerland |
2 |
|
Italy |
|
|
Greece |
|
|
South Africa |
|
|
Israel |
1 |
|
Pakistan |
|
|
India |
1 |
|
PR China |
2 |
|
Japan |
1 |
|
Thailand |
1 |
|
Australia |
3 |
|
New Zealand |
1 |
|
Fiji |
|
This includes all manuscripts, including ms' returned without full review. Note that the # weeks in review is biased to the low side because reviews that take longer are more likely to be ongoing, and therefore not represented in the statistic. "Current" is as of 20Jun04.
Current status of ms' submitted in 2004 |
|
|
|
Number of manuscripts submitted |
78 |
|
|
mean # weeks in review (stand. dev.) |
6.2 (5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number currently in review |
35 |
45% |
|
Number returned w/o review |
19 |
24% |
|
Number rejected |
9 |
11.5% |
|
Number not publishable in present form |
5 |
6.5% |
|
Number accepted, not yet published |
10 |
13% |
|
Number published or sent to press |
0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total rejected |
33 |
77% |
|
Total accepted |
10 |
23% |
|
|
|
|
|
Number Point of View submissions |
13 |
17% |
|
Number regular paper submissions |
65 |
83% |
|
Number POVs accepted |
3 |
|
|
Number regular papers accepted |
7 |
|
Submission rate: The
number of papers submitted has increased by 66% from 2001 to 2004.

SSB Website: David Cannatella will appoint a committee to deal with the society website. Both society and journal websites need to be coordinated and directed by a smaller group. A committee will be composed of Cannatella, Rod Page, and one additional person.
SSB Archive: David Cannatella will explore options for SSB Archive, including materials at U of Texas and the Smithsonian. David Penny suggests not publishing minutes in journal but rather placing on Web site. Council unanimously approves web publishing of minutes if it satisfies IRS regulations for publication of financial statements.
Data Sharing Society Summit: Pam Soltis presents proposal from ESA on data archiving.
|
This page is written in HTML 4.0 format. It is best viewed with Internet Explorer 5.0, Netscape 5.0, Safari 1.0 (v 85), or a later version of these browsers. For questions or comments regarding this site contact the webmaster. |
||||||